Of polygamy, monogamy and prostrate cancer

Share:

Man is by nature polygamous… Monogamy is not natural to man…


Man Is By Nature Polygamous. Monogamy Is Not Natural To Man. It Is Cultural

While one out of every eight White males in America and the United Kingdom will have prostate cancer, which is the leading form of cancer in men, one out of four Black men will develop that cancer (although some research puts it at one out of every six). Asians are the least likely to develop prostate cancer, with a probability of one in thirteen.

What is behind this troubling statistic?

Again, please fact-check me: The MENA region (MENA means Middle East and North Africa) and South Central Asia are some of the most polygamous parts of the world. They are only beaten by the parts of West Africa where Islam (and therefore, polygamy) is high.

Now, speaking of Northern Nigeria, how many times have you heard, read or witnessed a core Northern Muslim being diagnosed with prostate cancer? Though I have no statistics to back it up, in Nigeria, prostate cancer is more of a Southern affair.

I am legally married to only one wife, whom I love and do not cheat on. But the reason I do not have extramarital sexual relationships is not because I do not have the urge or the opportunity. It is because I have extreme self-control.

Men are by nature polygamous. It takes discipline to be monogamous because it runs counter to a man’s nature. And even the Western world is as or even more polygamous than many parts of the world. It is just that they practice a brand of polygamy that is defined by serial monogamy, i.e., they marry one wife and then divorce her, then marry another wife and so on.

If men and women are to be honest, they will accept that there are very few men able to be sexually faithful to only one woman. And why?

If you are one of those who have been brainwashed with European culture being passed off as Christian culture, please show me where one man, one wife was given as a rule in Scripture.

You cannot. Because it is not there. The best you can do, because you want to defend your conditioning by your colonial masters, is to take a verse that does not say that, and then give it your own prejudiced interpretation.

But what we know for a fact is that some of the holiest men in the Bible, including Abraham, Jacob, David, and Solomon, were polygamists, as was Elkanah, Samuel’s father.

Please fact-check me: According to research carried out by Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, the best and most natural way to reduce the risk of prostate cancer is to have sexual intercourse at least twenty times a month with partners who are faithful to you. If you do, you reduce the chances of developing prostate cancer by 31%. Just in case you think I am making this up, please read it yourself here https://health.harvard.edu/mens-health/ejaculation_frequency_and_prostate_cancer

Are you aware that what the Harvard Medical School just described above is polygamy?

Now, let me ask you an honest question. How many women can withstand that sexual demand from a man in one month?

And the logic, backed up by scientific data from Harvard Medical School, is just common sense.

It is the same in cars. If you leave fuel/gasoline/petrol in cars for three months without driving them, it will start to degrade and damage the car. For health and safety, if you have fuel in your car, you are advised to drive it regularly.

Our Creator did not design the prostate to store the male reproductive fluid for long periods.

And my Christian readers will say Christianity forbids polygamy. Not true. European Christendom forbids it. But there is no biblical prohibition against polygamy except you are a bishop, deacon or elder (another name for deacon):

“A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife”-1 Timothy 3:2.

“A deacon must be the husband of but one wife”-1 Timothy 3:12.

“An elder must be the husband of but one wife.”-Titus 1:6.

If polygamy was not a standard and sinless practice, why would Paul be specific about monogamy for Bishops or deacons? There would be no need for specificity if everyone practised monogamy.

Join Our Community to get Live Updates

Leave a Comment

We would like to keep you updated with special notifications.

×