The temporary suspension comes as the administration intensifies scrutiny of applicants’ online histories
Washington, D.C. – The U.S. State Department has temporarily suspended interviews for foreign student and exchange visa applicants worldwide as it implements stricter social media screening protocols. Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued the directive in a diplomatic cable Tuesday, citing enhanced vetting requirements to address potential security risks.
Key Details:
- All new interview appointments for F, M, and J visas are paused pending updated guidance
- Existing appointments remain valid for now
- Policy expands 2019 rules requiring social media disclosure on visa forms
- Comes amid Trump administration pressure on universities over campus speech
“The U.S. uses all available information in visa vetting,” a State Department spokesperson said, declining to specify what content might trigger rejections. The pause affects over 1.3 million international students currently studying in America, who contribute significantly to university finances and research programs.
Context:
The move follows Rubio’s March 25 order mandating social media checks for certain applicants through fraud prevention units. The secretary has recently revoked hundreds of visas, targeting some pro-Palestinian activists under the stated goal of combating campus harassment.
Controversy:
Academic groups warn the policy could:
- Damage U.S. higher education’s global competitiveness
- Create arbitrary barriers for qualified students
- Chill free expression through viewpoint-based screening
A federal judge recently blocked a related Trump administration attempt to bar Harvard from enrolling international students. Universities argue the new measures threaten their financial stability and academic workforce, with foreign students comprising majorities in some STEM research fields.
What’s Next:
Consular officers await detailed implementation rules as the administration balances security concerns against academic and economic interests. Observers expect legal challenges if screenings appear politically motivated rather than risk-based.